Hoy he escuchado un comentario que no me ha gustado nada, el comentario en cuestión hacía referencia a la imagen publicitaria de “coco Chanel rouge” decian que la modelo de la campaña publicitaria tenia arrugas en el contorno de los ojos.
Today I heard a comment that I did not like anything, the comment in question concerned the advertising image of "Coco Chanel rouge" said that the model of the advertising campaign had wrinkles around the eyes.
A ver, gente del mundo, ¿En qué quedamos? Ya parece que la cuestión sea quejarse! Cuando se ven naturales, nos quejamos porque se les ven arrugas e “imperfecciones” y se ven como gente normal que son. Cuando llevan demasiado photoshop, nos quejamos porque se ven demasiado artificiales y no parece real. Entonces, que hacemos? Con retoque o sin retoque?
Let's see, people in the world, Which is it? It seems that the question is complaining! When you look natural, we complain because they are wrinkles and "imperfections" and normal people look like they are. When they take too much photoshop, we complain because they are too artificial and does not seem real. So we do? With or without retouch retouching?
 |
| I love Julia, but here she have a lot of photoshop... |
Yo siempre he defendido la naturalidad, eso no quiere decir que condene al photoshop, mi photoshop del alma! Yo mismo he de admitir que lo uso para mis fotos, juego con los contrastes y la iluminación y alguna que otra cosa me hago, pero cosas sencillas, algún granito me quito, o si he pasado mala noche y tengo ojeras me las corrijo un poquito…
I have always defended the naturalness, that does not mean to condemn the photoshop, photoshop of my soul! I myself have to admit that I use for my photos, play with the contrast and lighting and some other things I do, but simple things, I take some pimple, or if I had a bad night and I have dark circles correct a little bit to me ...
Y vosotros que opinais? Naturalidad o artificialidad?
And you, who you think? Natural or artificial?
